An analysis of the land armies in europe

Marcouf Islands flanking the beach attwo hours in advance of the main attack. Directed to clear enemy minefields, control points, and observation posts, they found the islands heavily mined but otherwise unoccupied. During the main attack, German artillery managed to sink the U.

An analysis of the land armies in europe

By "genocide" we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos race, tribe and the Latin cide killingthus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homocide, infanticide, etc.

It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.

The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.

An analysis of the land armies in europe

Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group. The following illustration will suffice.

The confiscation of property of nationals of an occupied area on the ground that they have left the country may be considered simply as a deprivation of their individual property rights.

However, if the confiscations are ordered against individuals solely because they are Poles, Jews, or Czechs, then the same confiscations tend in effect to weaken the national entities of which those persons are members.

Genocide has two phases: This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor's own nationals.

Denationalization was the word used in the past to describe the destruction of a national pattern. Many authors, instead of using a generic term, use currently terms connoting only some functional aspect of the main generic notion of genocide.

Thus, the terms "Germanization," "Magyarization," "Italianization," for example, are used to connote the imposition by one stronger nation Germany, Hungary, Italy of its national pattern upon a national group controlled by it.

The author believes that these terms, are also inadequate because they do not convey the common elements of one generic notion and because they do not convey the common elements of one generic notion and they treat mainly the cultural, economic, and social aspects of genocide, leaving out the biological aspect, such as causing the physical decline and even destruction of the population involved.

If one uses the term "Germanization" of the Poles, for example, in this connotation, it means that the Poles, as human beings, are preserved and that only the national pattern of the Germans is imposed upon them. Such a term is much too restricted to apply to a process in which the population is attacked, in a physical sense, and is removed and supplanted by populations of the oppressor nations.

Genocide is the antithesis of the Rousseau-Portalis Doctrine, which may be regarded as implicit in the Hague Regulations.

This doctrine holds that war is directed against sovereigns and armies, not against subjects and civilians. In its modern application in civilized society, the doctrine means that war is conducted against states and armed forces and not against populations.

It required a long period of evolution in civilized society to mark the way from wars of extermination, 3 which occurred in ancient times and in the Middle Ages, to the conception of wars as being essentially limited to activities against armies and states.

In the present war, however, genocide is widely practiced by the German occupant. Germany could not accept the Rousseau-Portalis Doctrine: Consequently, in enforcing the New Order, the Germans prepared, waged, and continued a war [p.

For the German occupying authorities war thus appears to offer the most appropriate occasion for carrying out their policy of genocide. Their reasoning seems to be the following: The enemy nation within the control of Germany must be destroyed, disintegrated, or weakened in different degrees for decades to come.John Ford and Allan Dwan John Ford began directing films in the 's.

So did another prolific Hollywood director, Allan Dwan.A number of running elements in . An analysis of the land armies in europe Arms Race prior to , Armament Policy. The History Learning Site. The 2 Largest Land Armies in Europe Tiptoe to the Edge of War (and Back) More than 10, soldiers and civilians have already died in the ongoing war in eastern Ukraine, where Ukrainian troops are.

Analysis By the beginning of the Central Europe Campaign, Allied victory in Europe was inevitable. Having gambled his future ability to defend Germany on the Ardennes offensive and lost, Hitler had no real strength left to stop the powerful Allied armies.

Twenty-First Century Manoeuvre. June Held annually on behalf of the Chief of the General Staff, this conference reflected on the breadth of challenges confronting today’s land forces in a global security environment characterised by constant competition and unpredictability.

Countries in Europe ranked by their potential military strength. TOP ^ European Powers Ranked by Military Strength. Modern Europe has been Ground Zero for both of the global wars of the 20th Century.

European Powers Ranked by Military Strength. Square Land Areas. Coastline. Shared Borders. Waterway Coverage.

Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) | US Army War College