No Comments Leadership is an essential component of effective management and functioning of any organization. Despite the seeming simplicity of this concept, in modern science leadership has not received one common accurate and unified explanation.
The first problem is that the early searchers after traits often assumed that there was a definite set of characteristics that made a leader — whatever the situation. In other words, they thought the same traits would work on a battlefield and in the staff room of a school.
They minimized the impact of the situation Sadler They, and later writers, also tended to mix some very different qualities. Like other lists of this nature it is quite long — so what happens when someone has some but not all of the qualities?
More recently people have tried looking at what combinations of traits might be good for a particular situation.
There is some mileage in this. It appears possible to link clusters of personality traits to success in different situations, as Stogdill has subsequently suggested Wright Wright goes on to explore modern trait theories in a separate chapter — However, it remains an inexact science!
When men and women are asked about each others characteristics and leadership qualities, some significant patterns emerge. Both tend to have difficulties in seeing women as leaders. The attributes associated with leadership on these lists are often viewed as male.
However, whether the characteristics of leaders can be gendered is questionable.
If it is next to impossible to make a list of leadership traits that stands up to questioning, then the same certainly applies to lists of gender specific leadership traits! Behaviours As the early researchers ran out of steam in their search for traits, they turned to what leaders did — how they behaved especially towards followers.
They moved from leaders to leadership — and this became the dominant way of approaching leadership within organizations in the s and early s. Different patterns of behaviour were grouped together and labelled as styles.
Despite different names, the basic ideas were very similar. The four main styles that appear are: Here leaders emphasize the achievement of concrete objectives. They look for high levels of productivity, and ways to organize people and activities in order to meet those objectives.
In this style, leaders look upon their followers as people — their needs, interests, problems, development and so on. They are not simply units of production or means to an end.World-leading research, MBA, DBA, PhD, Executive Education, undergraduate and postgraduate programmes at Henley Business School.
However, Stogdill’s earlier work with the Ohio State Leadership Studies was an important attempt to set leadership in an organizational context through proper research.
Grint () reproduces a classic paper from – ‘Leadership, membership and organization’. This paper defines “context” as it relates to leadership and the inclusion of context in leadership theories.
I will show examples of different leadership styles and how they relate to the context of leadership. In closing, I will reflect on the challenges of contextual theories and how these challenges can be met in the current environment. Future Trends in Leadership Development By: Nick Petrie.
Contents About the Author 3 Experts Consulted During 3 This Study About This Project 5 Executive Summary 5 leadership is a collective process that is spread throughout networks of people.
The question will. Trait Theory ('s - 's) The trait leadership theory believes that people are either born or are made with certain qualities that will make them excel in leadership roles. That is, certain qualities such as intelligence, sense of responsibility, creativity and other values puts anyone in the shoes of a good leader.
Related Documents: Evolution of Leadership Theories Essay examples Essay on Leadership Theory U06d1 Assessment Team Excellence And Collaborative Team Leader Questionnaire As with the transformational and Authentic Leadership Theory, the Team Leadership is becoming one of the most utilized approaches in organizations to date.